# M/S PAISALO DIGITAL LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS S. E. INVESTMENTS LIMITED) vs M/S SUN CORP & ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-02-27
Citation: ARB.P.-1022/2025 2026:DHC:1814
Petitioner: M/S PAISALO DIGITAL LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS S. E. INVESTMENTS LIMITED)
Respondent: M/S SUN CORP & ORS.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/68027022026AA10222025_142325.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 27.02.2026 ARB.P. 1022/2025 M/S PAISALO DIGITAL LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS S. E. INVESTMENTS LIMITED) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harshal Kumar, Advocate. versus M/S SUN CORP & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nidhi Mohan Parashar, Mr. Vikrant Kumar and Mr. Amar Bajpayee, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL) HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. 1. The present Petition, filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, seeks appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for the purpose of resolution of disputes that are stated to have arisen inter se the parties arising out of the Clause 20 as set out in Hypothecation/Loan Agreement dated 02.03.2015. The said clause reads as follows: “20. Any conflict, difference, controversies, or disputes arising between the parties, if not resolved mutually, shall be submitted/referred to the arbitration of the Sole Arbitrator. The notices like Demand Notice, Loan Recall - cum - Demand Notice and/or telephonic conversations/ mails shall be deemed to be sufficient proof for opportunity given to the Borrower and/ or Guarantor(s) for re

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/february/m-s-paisalo-digital-limited-formerly-known-as-s-e-investments-limited-vs-m-s-sun-corp-ors