# KUSUM ROADWAYS vs HEMKUND FILL AND DRIVE & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-02-10
Citation: CRL.M.C.-1144/2026 2026:DHC:1120
Petitioner: KUSUM ROADWAYS
Respondent: HEMKUND FILL AND DRIVE & ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60910022026CRLMM11442026_190556.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

$~67 & 68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 10th February, 2026 CRL.M.C. 1144/2026 & CRL.M.A.4553/2026 & CRL.M.A. 4554/2026 KUSUM ROADWAYS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Y.S. Chauhan with Ms. Hinu Mahajan, Mr. Divyanhu and Mrs. A.S. Gahlot, Advocates. versus HEMKUND FILL AND DRIVE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rishab Garg, Advocate (through V.C.) CRL.M.C. 1145/2026& CRL.M.A. 4555/2026& CRL.M.A. 4556/2026 KUSUM ROADWAYS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Y.S. Chauhan with Ms. Hinu Mahajan, Mr. Divyanhu and Mrs. A.S. Gahlot, Advocates. versus HEMKUND FILL AND DRIVE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rishab Garg, Advocate (through V.C.) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. The issue raised in both the petitions is similar and, therefore, both these matters have been taken up together. 2. Two separate complaints were filed against M/s Kusum Roadways for commission of offence under Section 138 read with Section 141 of 1881. 3. The complainant is M/s Hemkund Fill and Drive. 4. The grievance of the petitioner i.e. accused, is merely to the effect that when his right to cross-examine the complainant had been closed on 18.08.2025, he filed an ap

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/february/kusum-roadways-vs-hemkund-fill-and-drive-anr