# CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 178 of 2025 at Lucknow

Court: Allahabad High Court
Date: 2026-02-03
Citation: CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 178 of 2025 at Lucknow
Petitioner: CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 178 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent: Unknown

[Official PDF on Allahabad High Court website](https://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebDownloadOriginalHCJudgmentDocument.do?translatedJudgmentID=63212)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. - 178 of 2025 State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy./ Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Public Works Deptt. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. .....Applicant(s) Versus Rajendra Kumar Sonwani And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : C.S.C. Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. (Order on C.M.Application No.1 of 2025; Application for Condonation of Delay) 1. Heard. 2. This is an application by the State seeking review of a judgment and order dated 16.01.2025 passed in Writ A No.470 of 2025 (State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy./Addl. Chief Secy. Public Works Deptt. Lko. vs. Rajendra Kumar Sonwani and Another). 3. There is a delay of about 245 days. Even though the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply stricto sensu to the review proceedings seeking review of a judgment passed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in view of a Single Judge Bench's decision in the case of Smt. Mohd. Jahan Begum & Another (M/S 349/2007) vs. Board of Revenue, U.P. Allahabad & Others passed in Review Petition No.329 of 2010 dated 23.09.2016, nevertheless, delay is a fac

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/february/civil-misc-review-application-defective-no-178-of-2025-at-lucknow