# CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 163 of 2025 at Lucknow

Court: Allahabad High Court
Date: 2026-02-03
Citation: CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 163 of 2025 at Lucknow
Petitioner: CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 163 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent: Unknown

[Official PDF on Allahabad High Court website](https://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebDownloadOriginalHCJudgmentDocument.do?translatedJudgmentID=63211)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. - 163 of 2025 Jainendra Pratap Singh .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. P.W.D. Lko.And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Som Kartik Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. (Order on C.M.Application No.1 of 2025; Application for Condonation of Delay) 1. Heard. 2. The judgment review of which has been sought by the applicant is dated 02.01.2023. The application seeking review has been filed on 23.09.2025. In the case at hand the delay is of 965 days' in filing the review application. Even though the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply stricto sensu to the review proceedings seeking review of a judgment passed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in view of a Single Judge Bench's decision in the case of Smt. Mohd. Jahan Begum & Another (M/S 349/2007) vs. Board of Revenue, U.P. Allahabad & Others passed in Review Petition No.329 of 2010 dated 23.09.2016, nevertheless, delay is a factor to be taken into consideration and is required to be explained. 3. We have gone through the af

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/february/civil-misc-review-application-defective-no-163-of-2025-at-lucknow