# AVG LOGISTICS LIMITED vs MS SHREE SHYAM PALACE

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-02-27
Citation: O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)-186/2026 2026:DHC:1817
Petitioner: AVG LOGISTICS LIMITED
Respondent: MS SHREE SHYAM PALACE

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/68027022026OMPMISCCOMM1862026_142818.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 27.02.2026 O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 186/2026 & I.A. 4706/2026 (Ex. From filing certified copy of the document) AVG LOGISTICS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Jain, Mr. Satyam Shivaach and Mr. Mohit Miglani, Advocates. versus MS SHREE SHYAM PALACE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Agarwal, Partner of Respondent-Firm, in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR JUDGEMENT (Oral) 1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 29A(4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, read with Section 7 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, seeking a second extension of the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator in arbitral proceedings, bearing Case Ref no. DIAC/6898/10-23, for a further period of six months beyond 27.02.2026. 2. The material on record indicates that the parties entered into a Sub-lease Agreement dated 15.09.20182. Subsequently, since disputes arose between the parties, the Petitioner invoked the Arbitration Clause 6 as per the terms of the Agreement, vide Notice dated 17.02.2022. 1 Act 2 Agreement 3. Accordingly, vide Order dated 25.09.2023, a learned Sole Arbitrator was a

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/february/avg-logistics-limited-vs-ms-shree-shyam-palace
