# TATA CAPITAL LIMITED vs M/S UNIQUE AUTO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-04-23
Citation: ARB.P.-1782/2025 2026:DHC:3389
Petitioner: TATA CAPITAL LIMITED
Respondent: M/S UNIQUE AUTO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/68023042026AA17822025_112039.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 23.04.2026 ARB.P. 1782/2025 & I.A. 31638/2025 (Seeking permission for amendment of the memo of parties) TATA CAPITAL LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Kumar and Ms. Ragini Kapoor, Advocates. versus M/S UNIQUE AUTO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Khyati Jain, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL) 1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“Act”], seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes inter se the parties arising out of the Loan-cum-Guarantee Agreement dated 19.08.2023 [“Agreement”]. 2. The material on record reflects that the Agreement stipulates a dispute resolution mechanism, which contemplates reference of disputes thereunder, inter se the parties, to Arbitration. The relevant stipulation is contained in Clause 12 of the Agreement [“Arbitration clause”]. The relevant portion of the same reads as follows:- “12. Arbitration If any dispute, difference or claim arises between any of the Obligors and the Lender in connection with the Facility or as to the i

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/april/tata-capital-limited-vs-m-s-unique-auto-sales-private-limited-ors