# SH. BADSHAH & ANR. vs UNION OF INDIA

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-04-29
Citation: FAO-86/2021 2026:DHC:3652
Petitioner: SH. BADSHAH & ANR.
Respondent: UNION OF INDIA

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/MKO29042026FAO862021_200340.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on : 27.04.2026 Pronounced on : 29.04.2026 Uploaded on : 29.04.2026 FAO 86/2021 SH BADSHAH & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rohit Nagar, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Subhash Tanwar, SPC for UOI with Mr. Sandeep Mishra, Mr.Harshit Deshwal, Mr. Mohit Kumar Tomar and Mr. Mayank Sehrawat, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI JUDGMENT 1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 against the judgment dated 05.12.2019 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Tribunal”) in Claim Application No. OA/II(U)/GZB/228/2018, titled as “Badshah & Anr. vs. Union of India”. 2. Vide the impugned judgment, the Tribunal dismissed the claim primarily on the ground that the incident in question was not an “untoward incident” within the meaning of the Railways Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) and consequently, did not return any finding on the issue of 3. The brief facts of the case, as stated in the claim application, are that on 07.02.2018, one Shahid (hereinafter referred to as the

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/april/sh-badshah-anr-vs-union-of-india