# ROHIT vs STATE(GNCT OF DELHI)

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-04-21
Citation: W.P.(CRL)-1269/2026 2026:DHC:3317
Petitioner: ROHIT
Respondent: STATE(GNCT OF DELHI)

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60821042026CRLW12692026_182729.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 21.04.2026 W.P.(CRL) 1269/2026 ROHIT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vigneraj Pasayat, DHSLSC with Mr. Naman Aggarwal and Mr. Eishaan, Advocates. versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Advocate with SI Deepak Kumar and Inspector Satvinder Singh, PS Jagat Puri. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioner seeks quashing of order No. F.18/13/2026/HG/PRISONS/ 5553-55 dated 24.03.2026 and seeks parole for a period of four weeks in case FIR No. 269/2014 of PS Jahangir Puri for offence under Section 302/341/34 IPC. 2. Broadly speaking, the parole application of the petitioner was rejected on the ground that the co-accused is on parole and as per Rule 1212(2) of the Delhi Prison Rules, more than one convicts cannot be released on parole simultaneously. W.P.(CRL) 1269/2026 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4556 9af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the impugned order is factually flawed since the co-convict Sunil has already expired on 30.01.2024. 4. L

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/april/rohit-vs-state-gnct-of-delhi