# PEPSICO INC. & ANR. vs PARLE AGRO PRIVATE LIMITED

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-04-15
Citation: I.A.-524/2026 2026:DHC:3100
Petitioner: PEPSICO INC. & ANR.
Respondent: PARLE AGRO PRIVATE LIMITED

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59415042026IA5242026_182411.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order reserved on : 07.04.2026 Order delivered on: 15.04.2026 CS(COMM) 268/2021 PEPSICO INC. & ANR. .....Plaintiffs versus PARLE AGRO PRIVATE LIMITED .....Defendant Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Plaintiff : Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Avni Sharma, Ms. Aparna Singh, Mr. Deepak Gogia, Mr. Aadhar Nautiyal and Ms. Shivangi Kohli, Advocates. For the Defendant : Mr. C.M. Lall, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ankit Arvind, Mr. Shashwat Rakshit and Ms. Nidhi Pathak, Advocates. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA ORDER TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J: I.A. 524/2026 (Under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC) 1. This is an application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred as “CPC”) filed on behalf of the plaintiffs seeking a direction to hold the defendant as also its principal officers guilty of wilfully violating and disobeying the order dated 18.09.2023, passed by this Court. 2. In the suit, the plaintiffs have sought a decree of permanent injunction, restraining infringement of registered trademark/tagline “For The Bold”, passing off, dilution, delivery up, damages 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/april/pepsico-inc-anr-vs-parle-agro-private-limited