# M/S TINNA RUBBER AND INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED vs M/S K.K. RECLAMATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-04-27
Citation: O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)-525/2025 2026:DHC:3568
Petitioner: M/S TINNA RUBBER AND INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED
Respondent: M/S K.K. RECLAMATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/68027042026OMPICOMM5252025_101202.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 27.04.2026 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 525/2025 M/S TINNA RUBBER AND INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rachana Maheshwari, Mr. Mannu Bansal and Ms. Priti, Advocates. versus M/S K.K. RECLAMATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Siddhant Solanki, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL) 1. The present Petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“Act”] seeks the following reliefs: “i) Pass an order of injunction restraining the Respondents, their agents, assignees, representatives, or any person claiming through or under them from alienating, transferring, encumbering, parting with possession, or creating third-party interest in respect of the movable as well as immovable properties in question referred to hereinabove as the "Said Properties" during the pendency of the arbitral proceedings; and/or ii) Pass an order directing the Respondents to maintain status quo with respect to the title, possession, nature, and character of the movable / immovable properties belonging to the abovementioned sister concerns of the Respond

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/april/m-s-tinna-rubber-and-infrastructure-limited-vs-m-s-k-k-reclamations-private-limited-ors