# HETALI ENTERPRISES & ANR. vs DR. VIJAY PURUSHOTTAM KALE

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-04-07
Citation: LPA-119/2026 2026:DHC:2864-DB
Petitioner: HETALI ENTERPRISES & ANR.
Respondent: DR. VIJAY PURUSHOTTAM KALE

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/68707042026LPA1192026_153448.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: 12.03.2026 & 13.03.2026 % Judgment Delivered on: 07.04.2026 LPA 119/2026 & CM No.15024/2026 HETALI ENTERPRISES & ANR. .....Appellants versus DR. VIJAY PURUSHOTTAM KALE .....Respondent LPA 120/2026 & CM No.15026/2026 HETALI ENTERPRISES & ANR. .....Appellants versus DR. SATISHCHANDRA P KALE & ANR. .....Respondents LPA 123/2026 & CM No.15460/2026 HETALI ENTERPRISES & ANR. .....Appellants versus DR. PURUSHOTTAM G. KALE .....Respondent Advocates who appeared in these cases For the Appellants : Mr. Robin Jaisinghani, Mr. Bhaskar Nayak and Ms. J. D’ Silva, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Viraj Kadam, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA 1. The present batch of Letters Patent Appeals have been preferred against the common judgment and order dated 07.01.2026 (“Impugned Order”) passed in W.P.(C) 10901/2022 , W.P.(C) 10921/2022 and W.P.(C) 10922/2022 (“Writ Petitions”), whereby the Writ Petitions challenging order dated 13.05.2022 (“Review Order”) passed in the Review Applications filed by the Appellants before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (“NCDRC”) seeking review 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/april/hetali-enterprises-anr-vs-dr-vijay-purushottam-kale