# CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1125 of 2026 at Allahabad

Court: Allahabad High Court
Date: 2026-04-20
Citation: CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1125 of 2026 at Allahabad
Petitioner: CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1125 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent: Unknown

[Official PDF on Allahabad High Court website](https://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebDownloadOriginalHCJudgmentDocument.do?translatedJudgmentID=87770)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1125 of 2026 X Juvenile (Minor) .....Revisionist(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Krishna Mani Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Rakesh Chandra, G.A. Court No. - 84 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel for opposite party no.2. The present criminal revision has been filed to quash the order dated 09.01.2026 passed by learned Juvenile Court/Additional Session Judge/Special Judge, POCSO Act, Sonbhadra in Criminal Appeal No.60/2022 (Nagendra Soni Vs. State of U.P. and others) and the order dated 31.10.2025 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Sonbhadra in Case Crime No.99 of 2025 under Sections- 103(1), 238 BNS, Section- 4/25 Arms Act, Police Station- Shaktinagar, District Sonbhadra. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits: (i) admittedly, the applicant was a juvenile aged about 17 years and 4 months on the date of alleged incident; (ii) the applicant has been falsely implicated; (iii) there is no specific or strong objection raised in the DPO report, other than the general and vague

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/april/criminal-revision-no-1125-of-2026-at-allahabad