# CR.RA/626/2012

Court: Gujarat High Court
Date: 2026-04-07
Citation: 2026:GUJHC:24217
Petitioner: CR.RA/626/2012
Respondent: Unknown

[Official PDF on Gujarat High Court website](https://gujarathc-casestatus.nic.in/gujarathc/viewNuetralCitation)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.RA/626/2012 JUDGMENT DATED: 07/04/2026 2026:GUJHC:24217 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST CONVICTION - NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT) NO. 626 of 2012 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR ============================================ Approved for Reporting Yes No ============================================ MAHMAD AAMAD PITHADIYA Versus MUKESH LAXMIDAS VAID & ANR. ============================================ Appearance: ADVOCATE NOTICE SERVED for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR .B A PATEL(5281) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 MR PM LAKHANI(1326) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 MRS R P LAKHANI(3811) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 MS. DIMPLE L. JOSHI(6407) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 MS SHRUTI PATHAK, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 2 ============================================ CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR Date : 07/04/2026 JUDGMENT (1) Today, when the matter is called out, the applicant remained absent despite service of Advocate notice to the applicant. Therefore, it clearly appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the present matter. Hence, in view of the judgment of

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/april/cr-ra-626-2012