# CIVIL REVISION No. 33 of 2026 at Allahabad

Court: Allahabad High Court
Date: 2026-04-30
Citation: CIVIL REVISION No. 33 of 2026 at Allahabad
Petitioner: CIVIL REVISION No. 33 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent: Unknown

[Official PDF on Allahabad High Court website](https://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebDownloadOriginalHCJudgmentDocument.do?translatedJudgmentID=87659)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CIVIL REVISION No. - 33 of 2026 Kumari Agrima Tripathi .....Revisionist(s) Versus Hariom Tiwari And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Om Prakash Pandey, Rakesh Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Court No. - 39 HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for third party/revisionist, Kumari Agrima Tripathi (minor) through her natural guardian and mother Smt. Ratna Tripathi. 2. The revisionist is daughter of sole plaintiff, Sri Hariom Tiwari. Sri Hariom Tiwari/plaintiff had filed a Suit No. 1103 of 2016 (Shri Hariom Tiwari Vs. Shri Satyapal Tiwari alias Satish Chand Tiwari), before the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kanpur Nagar. It has to be specified that the plaintiff has filed the present suit against his own father, Sri Satyapal Tiwari alias Satish Chand Tiwari. In the original suit, the plaintiff/opposite party no.1 seeks the relief that a decree of permanent injunction be passed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant restraining the defendant, his associates, attorney etc. from disposing of the suit property or dispossessing the plaintiff from the suit property in any manner

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/april/civil-revision-no-33-of-2026-at-allahabad