# YOGINDER KUMAR MEHTA vs ANIL KHANNA

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-09-01
Citation: CM(M)-1891/2024 2025:DHC:7687
Petitioner: YOGINDER KUMAR MEHTA
Respondent: ANIL KHANNA

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60901092025CMM18912024_183550.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 1st, September, 2025 CM(M) 1891/2024 & CM APPL. 9438/2024 & CM APPL. 45201/2025 YOGINDER KUMAR MEHTA .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Anurag Kumar Agarwal, Mr. Umesh Mishra, Mr. Ram Gupta and Mr. Prateek Agarwal, Advocates. versus ANIL KHANNA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manish Kumar Srivastava, Mr. Moksh Arora, Mr. Santosh R. And Ms. Somiya M., Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner is defending a suit which was filed way back in the year 2011. 2. When the case was at the stage of defendant’s evidence, an application was moved by the defendant seeking amendment in his written statement and also moved another application under Order VIII Rule 1A(3) read with Section 151 CPC seeking permission to place on record certain additional documents. By virtue of the abovesaid application, the petitioner i.e. defendant No.1 was seeking permission, inter alia, to place on record some certified copies of registered sale deeds, photocopies of “Khasra girdawari”. All these documents have been described in paragraph Nos. 6 & 7of the 3. Both these applications have been dismissed vide order dated 2

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/september/yoginder-kumar-mehta-vs-anil-khanna