# TRANS IMAGE CORPORATION vs M/S G3 INFO SYSTEMS PVT LTD & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-09-01
Citation: CM(M)-1685/2025 2025:DHC:7695
Petitioner: TRANS IMAGE CORPORATION
Respondent: M/S G3 INFO SYSTEMS PVT LTD & ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60901092025CMM16852025_172410.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 1st, September, 2025 CM(M) 1685/2025& CM APPL. 54820-54821/2025 TRANS IMAGE CORPORATION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma with Ms. Avsi Malik and Mr. Shubham, Advocates. Versus M/S G3 INFO SYSTEMS PVT LTD & ANR. .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner has filed a suit for recovery which is directed against two different companies. 2. When the plaintiff’s witness entered into witness-box and was under cross-examination, the defendants confronted them with one E-mail and the relevant question and the answer given by the witness and the further direction given by the Court read as under:- “At this stage, the witness is shown email dated 24.07.2012 sent by trimco@gmail.com to the defendant companies. Attention of the witness is drawn to point D of the said email. The e-mail is now Mark X1 Q. Is it correct to say that the above mentioned portion of the email reflects that counter-guarantees were being given by the defendant companies to the Plaintiff firm? Ans. I cannot recall if this email has been sent by the Plaintiff to the defendant. I will have to c

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/september/trans-image-corporation-vs-m-s-g3-info-systems-pvt-ltd-anr