# SARVINDER SINGH AND ANR vs VIPUL TANDON & ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-09-10
Citation: EFA(OS)-11/2022 2025:DHC:7850-DB
Petitioner: SARVINDER SINGH AND ANR
Respondent: VIPUL TANDON & ORS.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/75010092025EFAOS112022_153957.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 03.09.2025 Judgment pronounced on: 10.09.2025 EFA(OS) 11/2022 & CM APPL. 33800/2022 SARVINDER SINGH AND ANR .....Appellants Through: Mr. Prateesh Kapur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Aggarwal & Mr. Shubham Shankar Gogoi, Advocates. versus VIPUL TANDON & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anita Sahani, Advocate for R-2 Ms. Pallavi Parmar, Advocate for R-3 & 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR JUDGMENT ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. 1. Through the present Appeal, the Appellants [Decree Holders before the learned Single Judge] assail the correctness of order passed on 14.07.2022 [hereinafter referred to as ‘Impugned Order’], wherein the learned Single Judge while adjudicating an Execution Petition instituted pursuant to a decree passed under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’] proceeded to frame issues in three separate objections and directed restoration of possession/status quo ante, to be maintained until the final adjudication of the said objections. It is significant to note that the Respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4 [

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/september/sarvinder-singh-and-anr-vs-vipul-tandon-ors