# SAHIL RAO vs RICHA VATS & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-09-18
Citation: CRL.REV.P.(MAT.)-160/2025 2025:DHC:8444
Petitioner: SAHIL RAO
Respondent: RICHA VATS & ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/SKS18092025CRLRMAT1602025_183303.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 18.09.2025 CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 160/2025 SAHIL RAO ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Yash Aggarwal and Ms. Chitrakshi, Advocates versus RICHA VATS AND ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jayveer Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA JUDGMENT DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J. 1. The petitioner, by way of present revision petition, seeks setting aside of the order dated 18.02.2025 [hereafter „impugned order‟] passed by learned Judge, Family Court-01, North-East, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi [hereafter „Family Court‟] in MT Case No. 133/2024, titled ‘Richa Vats & Anr. vs. Sahil Rao’, whereby interim maintenance of ₹25,000/- per month has been awarded in favour of the respondents. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the marriage between the petitioner-husband and respondent no. 1-wife was solemnized on 28.01.2019 according to Hindu rites and customs at Ghaziabad. Respondent no. 1 alleges that her father had spent about ₹40 lakhs on the marriage and had given gifts beyond his capacity, but soon 2023. 3. In these circumstances, respondent no. 1 had filed a petition under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/september/sahil-rao-vs-richa-vats-anr