# Rajesh Laxmichand Bheda vs Ketan Vallabhji Veera

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2025-09-24
Citation: IA/3142/2025
Petitioner: Rajesh Laxmichand Bheda
Respondent: Ketan Vallabhji Veera

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6ImZGQVJtMWpYMmVCVzA1UVB3NVRBSnc9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiUHo3bDhOWGpVdVF5ckVOVXRndXF4Qkp2aE9qTElXL2lNZHg2K1NFd2Z2cko3SXQ2Vm8yQzJlS0NzSGRTa2EwdW9la1NDRG5XK3NBK3h4Qm5zUXlad2c9PSIsIm1hYyI6ImY4MzBjMmM0NTQyOWQ2YjUyN2Y4MDNkNTNkYThmZGZkZTBhZDFlYmVhNzJkOTY1YjNhYThlODI1NjhhNThjYTgiLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782774960&signature=2860aa4c8f421e61be425c4338b78a7456ec2dd2f97d344666e4f8c0822196d1)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

14. Mr. Ashish Kamat, a/w. Mr. Maulik Vora, Ms. Akshata Pawar, i/b. Pramodkumar and Co. for Defendant Nos. 2 to 7. Mr. Aadhil Parshurampurya a/w. Mr. Kartikey Aavasthi for defendant No.9. Page no. 1 of 15 78-IA-3142-3144-2025.doc CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATED : 24th SEPTEMBER 2025 ORDER: 1. Interim Application No. 3142 of 2025 is filed by defendant no. 3 and Interim Application No. 3144 of 2025 is filed by defendant no. 9 under Order VII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (“CPC”) for a direction to return the plaint for presentation before the appropriate court. Alternatively, the applicants have prayed that necessary directions be issued to renumber the plaint as a regular suit. It is contended by these defendants that the suit filed and instituted as a commercial suit would not fall under the definition of Section 2(1)(c) of the Commercial Courts Act (‘said Act’). Submissions On Behalf Of Defendant Nos. 3 and 9: 2. Learned counsels for these defendants relied upon various averments in the plaint to point out that the plaintiffs have identified themselves as co-owners of the subject property. Although they have prayed for relief of possession and declaration in respect of

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/september/rajesh-laxmichand-bheda-vs-ketan-vallabhji-veera
