# SURESH KUMAR YADAV AND ORS vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-10-15
Citation: W.P.(C)-6179/2025 2025:DHC:9203-DB
Petitioner: SURESH KUMAR YADAV AND ORS
Respondent: UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/CHS15102025CW61792025_145529.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 6179/2025 SURESH KUMAR YADAV AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vinay Yadav, CGSC, Mr. Neeraj Paulose Raj, Mr. Ansh Karla and Ms. Kamna Behrani, Advs. Mr Ajay Pal Law Officer and Mr Ramniwas Yadav CRPF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 15.10.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. The issue in controversy is to the entitlement of the petitioners to the grade pay of ₹ 5400 after having served for four years in the grade pay of ₹ 4800. 2. The issue is covered by the various judgments of this Court including, (i) judgment dated 9 September 2024 in WP(C) 690/2022 (Sushil Kumar v Union of India1), which was affirmed by the Supreme Court on merits by order dated 17 April 2025 in SLP(C) 13406/2025 (Union of India v Sushil Kumar), 1 2024 SCC OnLine Del 6482 3. Mr. Vinay Yadav, learned CGSC, candidly acknowledges this position but submits that the department is in the process of filing a review petition, even after the SLP against the decision in Sushil Kumar has been dismissed. 4. Nonetheless, given the abov

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/october/suresh-kumar-yadav-and-ors-vs-union-of-india-and-ors