# STATE vs JAI PRAKASH & ANR

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-10-30
Citation: CRL.L.P.-592/2017 2025:DHC:9683
Petitioner: STATE
Respondent: JAI PRAKASH & ANR

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/NBK30102025CRLMP5922017_160735.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30th October, 2025 CRL.L.P. 592/2017 STATE Govt. of NCT Delhi. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for State. versus 1. JAI PRAKASH S/o Asha Ram R/o H.No.374, Village Bajitpur, Delhi. 2. KRISHNA W/o Sh. Jai Prakash R/o H.No.374, Village Bajitpur, Delhi. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Mr. Shiv kumar. Ms Reema, and Mr Adarsh Pratap Gautam, Advocates for R-1 and R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral) CRL.L.P. 592/2017 1. An Application under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) was filed on behalf of the Petitioner, challenging the impugned Judgment dated January 21, 2017, of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi, acquittal of the Respondents herein, for the offences 2. It is submitted in the Petition that the learned Trial Court's impugned judgment is based on presumption, conjectures, and surmises, and as such, cannot withstand legal scrutiny and is therefore liable to be set aside. The learned Trial Court has allegedly erred in appreciating the evidence presented by the Prosecution in the right perspective, despite all Prosecution wit

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/october/state-vs-jai-prakash-anr