# RUGHRAM & ORS. vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-10-13
Citation: CRL.REV.P.-1320/2024 2025:DHC:9269
Petitioner: RUGHRAM & ORS.
Respondent: STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/SKS13102025CRLR13202024_203612.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 13.10.2025 CRL.REV.P. 1320/2024 & CRL.M.A. 35693/2024 RUGHRAM & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Pranav Gupta and Mr. Siddhant Verma, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State CORAM: HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA JUDGMENT DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J 1. The petitioners, who are the accused persons in FIR bearing no. 53/2022, registered at Police Station RK Puram, Delhi, have preferred this revision petition assailing the order dated 24.07.2024 [hereafter „impugned order‟] passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (SFTC), Patiala House Court, New Delhi [hereafter „Sessions Court‟] whereby charges have been framed against the petitioners for commission of offence punishable under Sections 376D/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [hereafter „IPC‟]. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that the FIR was registered on 22.01.2022 on the basis of a written complaint filed by CRL.REV.P. 1320/2024 3. During the course of investigation, on 22.01.2022 itself, the Investigating Officer (I.O.) recorded the statement of the prosecutrix unde

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/october/rughram-ors-vs-state-of-nct-of-delhi