# JAI MAA VAISHNO STEEL THROUGH PROPRIETOR MS. KAMLESH DEVI vs GULSHAN GUGNANI

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-10-27
Citation: CM(M)-2046/2025 2025:DHC:9366
Petitioner: JAI MAA VAISHNO STEEL THROUGH PROPRIETOR MS. KAMLESH DEVI
Respondent: GULSHAN GUGNANI

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60827102025CMM20462025_142925.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 27.10.2025 CM(M) 2046/2025, CM APPL. 66468/2025, 66467/2025 & 66466/2025 JAI MAA VAISHNO STEEL THROUGH PROPRIETOR MS. KAMLESH DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anshuman, Advocate versus GULSHAN GUGNANI .....Respondent Through: None CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R (ORAL) 1. Petitioner/plaintiff has assailed orders dated 08.07.2025 and 24.09.2025 of the learned trial court, whereby applications of the respondent/defendant under Order XI Rule 1 CPC and under Order XVI Rule 1 CPC were allowed, thereby taking on record the pen drive containing certain audio recordings, and granting opportunity to the respondent/defendant to prove the same in accordance with law; and the review application was dismissed. 2. Having heard learned counsel for petitioner/plaintiff, I do not find it a fit case to even issue notice of this petition. CM(M) 2046/2025 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4556 9af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d155709 96b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, 3. It is argued on behalf of petitioner/plai

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/october/jai-maa-vaishno-steel-through-proprietor-ms-kamlesh-devi-vs-gulshan-gugnani