# CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 34854 of 2025 at Allahabad

Court: Allahabad High Court
Date: 2025-10-27
Citation: CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 34854 of 2025 at Allahabad
Petitioner: CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 34854 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent: Unknown

[Official PDF on Allahabad High Court website](https://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebDownloadOriginalHCJudgmentDocument.do?translatedJudgmentID=50300)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34854 of 2025 Ravi Baghel .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arun Kumar Vishvakarma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 3. Heard Sri Vijay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate holding brief of Sri Arun Kumar Vishvakarma, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri R.P. Singh, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the material placed on record. 4. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.333 of 2025, under Sections 103(1), 238 B.N.S. and Section 4/25 Arms Act, Police Station Vrindavan, District Mathura, during the pendency of trial. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is not named in the FIR and has been falsely implicated in the present case. His name has come up on the information received from a squealer and he is visible in the CCTV footage purchasing a wine bottle from a liquor shop, as such, it is a clear-cut case of false implication. The FIR is delayed by about eight days and there is no explanation 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/october/criminal-misc-bail-application-no-34854-of-2025-at-allahabad