# RAJU SINGH @ MEENA vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-11-13
Citation: CRL.A.-51/2018 2025:DHC:10048
Petitioner: RAJU SINGH @ MEENA
Respondent: THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/MKO13112025CRLA512018_233145.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 13.11.2025 CRL.A. 51/2018 RAJU SINGH @ MEENA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Faraz Maqbool (DHCLSC), Ms. Sana Juneja and Ms. Deepshika, Advocates versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for State with SI Sangeeta Malik, PS Bindapur Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The present appeal seeks to assail the impugned judgment dated 11.12.2017 of the appellate/Sessions Court in relation to FIR 71/14. The matter was initially tried before the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, where the accused was acquitted vide judgement dated 21.04.2017. However, in the appeal preferred by the State, the Sessions Court set aside the judgement of acquittal and convicted the appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 394/34 of the IPC. Sentence of the appellant was suspended by this Court vide order dated 19.03.2018. 2. The facts in nutshell are that as per case of prosecution, the alleged 3. The prosecution examined a total of 11 witnesses in support of its case, the primary witnesses being the two victims, Narender Kumar and Vivek Dogra, who were examined as PW-

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/november/raju-singh-meena-vs-the-state-govt-of-nct-of-delhi