# RAJIV SAREEN vs M/S DIVYANSHU ENTERPRISES AND OTHERS

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-11-13
Citation: RFA(OS)-7/2022 2025:DHC:9916-DB
Petitioner: RAJIV SAREEN
Respondent: M/S DIVYANSHU ENTERPRISES AND OTHERS

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/75013112025RFAOS72022_120946.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 03.11.2025 Judgment pronounced on: 13.11.2025 RFA(OS) 7/2022, CM APPL. 7480/2023, CM APPL. 7481/2023, CM APPL. 7482/2023, CM APPL. 7483/2023, CM APPL. 57284/2023 and CM APPL. 15708/2025 RAJIV SAREEN .....Appellant Through: Mr. Manish Makhija and Ms. Simran Makhija, Advs. versus M/S DIVYANSHU ENTERPRISES AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr. O. P. Pahuja, Adv. for PNB. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR JUDGMENT ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. 1. Through the present Appeal, the Appellant [Plaintiff before the learned Single Judge] assails the correctness of judgment dated 02.02.2022 [hereinafter referred to as „Impugned Judgment‟] passed by the learned Single Judge in CS(OS) 83/2021, whereby the learned Single Judge allowed I.A. No. 14422/2021 filed by Respondent No.3 [Defendant No.3 before the learned Single Judge] under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as „CPC‟] and, in exercise of the powers conferred thereunder, rejected the plaint. 2. The issue which arises for consideration in the present Appeal is whether a civil su

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/november/rajiv-sareen-vs-m-s-divyanshu-enterprises-and-others