# RAHUL TYAGI vs KAMLESH & ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-11-12
Citation: CM(M)-2150/2025 2025:DHC:9870
Petitioner: RAHUL TYAGI
Respondent: KAMLESH & ORS.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60812112025CMM21502025_180924.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 12.11.2025 CM(M) 2150/2025, CM APPL. 70381/2025 & 70382/2025 RAHUL TYAGI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sehdev Gupta and Ms. Nirja, Advocates. versus KAMLESH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R (ORAL) 1. Petitioner/plaintiff has assailed order dated 22.05.2025 of the learned trial court, whereby his application under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act to send the seal covered documents to some government agency for forensic analysis was dismissed. Having heard the learned counsel for petitioner, I do not find it a fit case to even issue notice. 2. Broadly speaking, the circumstances relevant for present purposes are as follows. The petitioner/plaintiff filed certain documents in a sealed cover before the trial court. Those documents were primarily a Will, General Power of Attorney and a Possession Letter. The petitioner/plaintiff in the application under Section 45 of the Evidence Act pleaded that he has CM(M) 2150/2025 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3 962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, KATHPALIA ser

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/november/rahul-tyagi-vs-kamlesh-ors