# NAVA SAMAJ MANDAL vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2025-11-07
Citation: WP/9206/2021
Petitioner: NAVA SAMAJ MANDAL
Respondent: STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6ImJTeXNneDNEMis5c1R4WFhEandOT0E9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiK2dGWmNBak9FWDBic3hCN2YrbC9QNnIraWk2UzBJN0kwL21kNWdzQ0x4ekIvLzh5TGNDa0V0N0FOQXVJemxJaEE2emwwVmJ6TzVNS0xyeTlML3U1OWc9PSIsIm1hYyI6IjNjMjUxMThmMjkwODIzMmE1Y2E4NGY2NGY1Zjg4ODZmNDEyZWQ5ZTY4NDkxMjllMTVjYWY0MTI1ZDVlYTJiZTciLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782774503&signature=e2e73246c310a6e7e4b208316ec34113f1bafa2f3ef4204f2751cfd6fc6bda5c)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

k 1/11 15 wp 9206.21 as.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9206 OF 2021 1. Nava Samaj Mandal 2. Nitin Godiwala Junior College of Commerce ....Petitioners V/S 1. State of Maharashtra 2. The Regional Dy Director of Education Mumbai Region 3. Presiding Officer School Tribunal Mumbai 4. Santosh Upadhyay ....Respondents _________ Ms. Rujuta Joshi i/b Ms. Monika Parikh for the Petitioners. Ms. Savina R. Crasto, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2/State. Mr. Vimal Sanghavi for Respondent No.4. __________ CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 7 NOVEMBER 2025. ORAL JUDGMENT: 1. The Petition challenges judgment and order dated 1 October 2021 passed by Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, Mumbai allowing Appeal No.1 of 2020 filed by the Respondent No.4 challenging his ‘otherwise termination’ from 26 November 2019. The School Tribunal, while allowing the Appeal, has set aside the oral termination of the Respondent No.4 and has directed the Petitioner-Management to reinstate him on his previous post as a full time Assistant Teacher for Hindi subject with full backwages and continuity in service. katkam Page No. 1 of 11 k 2/11 15 wp 9206.21 as.doc

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/november/nava-samaj-mandal-vs-state-of-maharashtra-and-ors