# M/S WIRETEL SOLUTION PVT.LTD vs M/S ANNU INFRA CONSTRUCT INDIA PVT. LTD. THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-11-20
Citation: FAO(OS) (COMM)-271/2024 2025:DHC:10311-DB
Petitioner: M/S WIRETEL SOLUTION PVT.LTD
Respondent: M/S ANNU INFRA CONSTRUCT INDIA PVT. LTD. THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/75020112025FAC2712024_154154.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 20.11.2025 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 271/2024 and CM APPL. 67957/2024 M/S WIRETEL SOLUTION PVT.LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ravikesh Kumar Sinha, Adv. versus M/S ANNU INFRA CONSTRUCT INDIA PVT. LTD. THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Dahiya, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR J U D G M E N T (ORAL) ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. 1. Through the present Appeal, the Appellant assails the correctness of an order dated 04.09.2024 [hereinafter referred to as ‘Impugned Order’] passed by the learned Single Judge in OMP (COMM) 40/2023 captioned Wiretel Solution Pvt. Ltd. v. Annu Infra Construct India Pvt. Ltd. 2. Admittedly, the Petition filed by the Appellant under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [hereinafter referred to as ‘AC Act’] against the Award passed by the learned Arbitrator is pending adjudication before the learned Single Judge. 3. On 04.09.2024, learned counsel representing the Appellant had submitted that the Award passed by the Arbitrator is liable to be set 37. 4. The learned Single Judge observed that there is not even a w

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/november/m-s-wiretel-solution-pvt-ltd-vs-m-s-annu-infra-construct-india-pvt-ltd-through-managing-director