# M/S DSI SOLUTION PVT. LTD. (OPC) THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR PRAVEEN SAINI vs SH. NARESH KUMAR HOODA

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-11-20
Citation: CM(M)-2238/2025 2025:DHC:10222
Petitioner: M/S DSI SOLUTION PVT. LTD. (OPC) THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR PRAVEEN SAINI
Respondent: SH. NARESH KUMAR HOODA

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60820112025CMM22382025_142656.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 20.11.2025 CM(M) 2238/2025 & CM APPL. 72859/2025 M/S DSI SOLUTION PVT. LTD. (OPC) THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR PRAVEEN SAINI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S.N. Gautam, Advocate. versus SH. NARESH KUMAR HOODA .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R (ORAL) 1. Petitioner/defendant by invoking Article 227 of the Constitution of India has assailed order dated 11.08.2025 of the learned trial court, whereby application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC filed by the respondent/plaintiff seeking permission to sign and attest the verification clause at foot of the plaint was allowed. Having heard learned counsel for petitioner/defendant, I do not find it a fit case to even issue notice. 2. Broadly speaking, it appears that the respondent/plaintiff, while instituting a suit for money recovery duly signed the plaint and even the supporting affidavit, but due to inadvertence did not sign the verification clause, though the same was textually complete. It is in order to rectify that CM(M) 2238/2025 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHP

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/november/m-s-dsi-solution-pvt-ltd-opc-through-its-director-praveen-saini-vs-sh-naresh-kumar-hooda