# VIJAY SHARMA vs VIVEK MAKHIJA

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2025-05-09
Citation: ARBAP/123/2024
Petitioner: VIJAY SHARMA
Respondent: VIVEK MAKHIJA

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6ImE4aC8zcmU4UjZ5dXhrNXovN1JCa2c9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoicHRIVzNIN1gvZGdzZDJSc0I4L0hZNHhZd3IzMSt5NXh6SkFpMWIyTnRlWnc0NGNwSmNaaTloYklvSG9MVzBGb2RmeEJLcno3Q1dIR0ZQTjZSeHpkMUE9PSIsIm1hYyI6ImQwZjJkZjQ2N2ZhZGJjZDgwOTE1M2I3NTg3ZTViYTQ4ZThjNDg4ZTEzMzNlM2MyMGY5ZWQ4Mzc1MjlmYzU2ZmEiLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782776218&signature=58c8928df91903a8811b026504e535641988348d3891ced9fe107f6d36335fea)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

1-ARBAP-123-2024.doc copy.docx Digitally IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY signed by PURTI PURTI PRASAD PRASAD PARAB PARAB Date: ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION 2025.05.22 15:34:01 +0530 ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 123 OF 2024 Vijay Sharma …Applicant Versus Vivek Makhija and Anr. …Respondents Mr. Karl Tamboly a/w Mr. Dinesh Tiwari and Mr. Anish Sharma i/b Dinesh D. Tiwari and Associates for the Applicant. Dr. Abhinav Chandrachud for the Respondents. CORAM : SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J. DATE : MAY 9, 2025 Oral Judgment : 1. This Application has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act”). 2. This matter was heard at length on a few occasions to consider the the resistance to proceeding to arbitration under the arbitration agreement whose existence is not in dispute. 3. The primary objection presented by the Respondents primarily is based on the premise that the issues involved in this Application under Section 11 have already been adjudicated in the past by an order dated January 31, 2022 (“2022 Order”) passed by the Learned Single Judge of this May 9, 2025 1-ARBAP-123-2024.doc copy.docx Court, with a direction that the instrument 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/may/vijay-sharma-vs-vivek-makhija