# SUDHAKAR REDDY vs KAKARTHI @ AARTHI

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-05-15
Citation: CM(M)-3788/2024 2025:DHC:3906
Petitioner: SUDHAKAR REDDY
Respondent: KAKARTHI @ AARTHI

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60915052025CMM37882024_160518.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 15th May, 2025 CM(M) 3788/2024 & CM APPL. 65446/2024& CM APPL. 6954/2025 SUDHAKAR REDDY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harsha Gollamudi with Mr. Naman Sharma, Advocates. versus KAKARTHI @ AARTHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Meena Mehtani Gupta, SC with Ms. Vishakha, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner is defending a suit for recovery of Rs. 4,50,000/- with interest. 2. The issues were framed by the learned Trial Court on 06.10.2023 and the matter was fixed for recording of plaintiff’s evidence. 3. According to learned counsel for defendant, though, he had received the advance copy of affidavit of plaintiff, it was neither signed nor attested and, therefore, he sent request to his counter-part to provide him with a proper photocopy. 4. Learned counsel for respondent/plaintiff also submits that, initially, unsigned and unattested copy was supplied but after receiving such message, the copy was supplied to the learned counsel for the defendant. 5. Fact remains that on 09.02.2024, there was a request for adjournment from the side of the defendant and, though, the matter was adjourn

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/may/sudhakar-reddy-vs-kakarthi-aarthi