# SHATRUGHAN PRASAD AND ORS vs RUPAN JAIN AND ORS

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-05-22
Citation: CM(M)-959/2025 2025:DHC:4320
Petitioner: SHATRUGHAN PRASAD AND ORS
Respondent: RUPAN JAIN AND ORS

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60922052025CMM9592025_123344.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 22nd May, 2025 CM(M) 959/2025 & CM APPL. 31514-31515/2025 SHATRUGHAN PRASAD AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Satpal Singh, Advocate. versus RUPAN JAIN AND ORS .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioners have taken exception to order dated 04.02.2025 whereby their objections filed under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC have been dismissed. 2. The execution is fallout of one suit filed by plaintiff (Mrs. Rupan Jain) in the year 2005. 3. She filed a suit for declaration, possession and injunction against six defendants and such suit was, eventually, decreed in her favour on 06.01.2016. According to her, she was owner of 1/5th share of the property in question which was situated at Old Rohtak Road, Sarai Rohilla, Delhi and was let out to one Sh. T.N. Bhaskar (predecessor-in-interest of defendant Nos.1 to 3). 4. There was also some dispute between the plaintiff and defendant Nos.4 and 5, which gave rise to another suit i.e. suit for partition. However, such suit for partition was disposed of as settled and a decree was, accordingly, passed on 13.02.1991. 5. All in all, the

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/may/shatrughan-prasad-and-ors-vs-rupan-jain-and-ors