# NARINDER SINGH AND ANR. vs UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-05-28
Citation: W.P.(C)-8133/2023 2025:DHC:4504
Petitioner: NARINDER SINGH AND ANR.
Respondent: UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/PRJ28052025CW81332023_143038.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

$~P-3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on 28.05.2025 W.P.(C) 8133/2023 NARINDER SINGH AND ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravin Rao, Mr. Akshit Sawal, Advocates. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC, with Ms. Priya Singh and Ms. Robina Rai, Advocates. Ms. Amita Singh Kalkal and Ms. Aditi Gupta, Advocates for R-5 and 6. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN JUDGMENT 1. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners challenge the appointments of respondents No. 5 and 6 to the posts of Senior Assistant and Administrative Officer, respectively, in respondent No. 3- Hansraj College [“the College”], which took place pursuant to an advertisement issued by the College, published in “Employment News” dated 24.02.2018-02.03.2018.1 2. It is stated in the writ petition that the petitioners are both employees of the College. 1 Annexure R-6/3 to the counter affidavit filed by respondent No. 6. 3. A copy of the advertisement has been annexed to the writ petition, which shows that one post each of Administrative Officer and Senior Assistant was advertised, both in the unreserved category. The app

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/may/narinder-singh-and-anr-vs-university-of-delhi-and-ors
