# MS PRIME GOLD SAIL JVC LIMITED vs SHUBHAM STEEL INDUSTRIES

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-05-08
Citation: CM(M)-868/2025 2025:DHC:3478
Petitioner: MS PRIME GOLD SAIL JVC LIMITED
Respondent: SHUBHAM STEEL INDUSTRIES

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60908052025CMM8682025_115802.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 08th May, 2025 CM(M) 868/2025 & CM APPL. 27914-27915/2025 MS PRIME GOLD SAIL JVC LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anjaneya Mishra with Mr. Sahil and Mr. Nidish, Advocates. versus SHUBHAM STEEL INDUSTRIES .....Respondent Through: Mr. Karan Valecha with Mr. NamanTandon and Mr. Vishal Singhal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner is plaintiff before the learned Trial Court. 2. After framing of issues, a list of witnesses was filed by the plaintiff in which he mentioned four witnesses. Out of such four witnesses, two witnesses have already been examined and one has been dropped. 3. The petitioner, merely, seeks to examine the sole left out witness Mr. Sanjeev Agarwal. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner admits that the plaintiff should have been careful and should have taken requisite steps for the purposes of his examination at the earliest available opportunity. However, at the same time, 5. Learned counsel for respondent/defendant appears on advance notice and submits that thereafter the matter was taken up on several occasions and the defendants have closed their evidenc

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/may/ms-prime-gold-sail-jvc-limited-vs-shubham-steel-industries