# M/S VANDANA ENTERPRISES vs M/S PADAMSHREE INDUSTRIES & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-05-26
Citation: CM(M)-914/2025 2025:DHC:4475
Petitioner: M/S VANDANA ENTERPRISES
Respondent: M/S PADAMSHREE INDUSTRIES & ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60926052025CMM9142025_163610.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 26th May, 2025 CM(M) 914/2025 & CM APPL. 29887/2025 M/S VANDANA ENTERPRISES .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Anjeneya Mishra with Mr. Sahil and Mr. Nidish Gupta, Advocates. versus M/S PADAMSHREE INDUSTRIES & ANR .....Respondent Through: Appearance not given. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Learned counsel for respondent No. 1 has joined the proceedings through video conferencing. 2. The point raised in the present petition is very short and precise. 3. Petitioner has filed a suit for recovery and according to plaintiff, it even placed on record a copy of such registration certificate before the learned Trial Court. 4. However, when the case was at the stage of plaintiff’s evidence, plaintiff neither submitted any list of witnesses nor examined any official from Registrar of Firm in order to substantiate that the firm in question was a registered one. 5. The case was, thereafter, fixed for defendant’s evidence and it was at that stage of the case, the plaintiff moved an application seeking examination of the concerned Official from the Registrar of Firm to prove the abovesaid fact. 6. It is noticed

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/may/m-s-vandana-enterprises-vs-m-s-padamshree-industries-anr