# KALINDI PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED vs MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2025-05-26
Citation: CAW/2047/2018
Petitioner: KALINDI PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED
Respondent: MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6IlVQM0xSS25ldEJVRGV5RkVzc1lsZ2c9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiazhxaWlVcDdkcUtGS095MEVLK1ErcGpHVlZiNFJNVjlEMGpjdXcvUEgxNkNQYldXTHVyU1hmZ2JhajRTVFQxczltK0J5MzE5U2lyQXBkdklVRmQ5TkE9PSIsIm1hYyI6IjQ4OTVlOTc0MTMxZjYxYjY0MTdhZWVkNWQxMGRmZThhMzYxYzZhZWZmYzA3ZTk0MjExNmViNDlkNzQ3ZTFhM2QiLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782776193&signature=5b1ef020bb7000dbe17803587e8051647a4e69b60ecd6e710720e372e979b719)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

RAMESHWAR LAXMAN DILWALE 1961. Head quarter at Andheri, } Mumbai-400 093, and having its office } at MIDC, Office Complex Building 1st } Floor, Near Wagale Estate Octroi Naka, } Thane-400 604. }..Petitioner Versus 1. Union Bank of India, } a banking corporation constituted } under the provisions of the Banking } Companies (Acquisition and } Transfer for Undertaking) Act, 1970 } and having its Head Office at 239 } Vidhan Bhavan Marg, Backbay } Reclamation, Mumbai-400 020 and } a branch amongst others at 66/80 } Mumbai Samachar Marg, Mumbai } 400 023 through authorised officer } Shri Hari Krishnan K, Senior Manager. } 2. M/s. Benelon Industries, } a partnership firm under the Indian } Partnership Act, 1932 and having its } office at 109 Sir Vithaldas Chambers, } Appollo Street, Mumbai-400 023 } and having its factory at D/9, 21st } Road, Marol Industrial Estate Area, } Andheri-400 093, through any } authorized officer/partner. } 3. Phiroz Horumsjee Patel residing at } Flat No.214, 12th Road, Jolly Maker } Apartments No.3, Cuffe Parasde, } Colaba, Mumbai-400 005 } 1/29 3-WP-1930-11 GROUP judgment-.doc Rameshwar Dilwale 4. Income Tax Recovery Officer, } Range -12 (1), Room No.117, } Aa

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/may/kalindi-properties-private-limited-vs-maharashtra-industrial-development-corporation