# BHARAT GHAI THROUGH WIFE SMT HARPREET KAUR vs SHRI RAJU GROVER SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-05-09
Citation: CM(M)-882/2025 2025:DHC:3527
Petitioner: BHARAT GHAI THROUGH WIFE SMT HARPREET KAUR
Respondent: SHRI RAJU GROVER SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES & ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59009052025CMM8822025_133153.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 09.05.2025 CM(M) 882/2025 & CM APPL. 28491/2025 BHARAT GHAI THROUGH WIFE SMT HARPREET KAUR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Ralli, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Chetanya Baweja, Mr. Ravi Kant Yadav & Mr. Praful Nawani, Advocate. versus SHRI RAJU GROVER SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Sunanda Nimisha, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) CM APPL. 28491/2025 [Exemption from filing certified/typed copies] 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. 2. The Application stands disposed of. CM(M) 882/2025 3. The present Petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to impugn the order dated 16.04.2025 passed by the Presiding Officer, MACT-02, South West, Dwarka Court, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”]. By the Impugned Order, the final arguments in the matter have been adjourned to the end of July, 2025. 4. Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner’s case is a case of exceptional suffering and crises. It is submitted that the hus

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/may/bharat-ghai-through-wife-smt-harpreet-kaur-vs-shri-raju-grover-since-deceased-through-his-legal-representatives-anr