# ADITYA MADAAN vs COMMISSIONER CGST GST COMMISSIONERATE DELHI & ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-05-23
Citation: W.P.(C)-5650/2024 2025:DHC:4427-DB
Petitioner: ADITYA MADAAN
Respondent: COMMISSIONER CGST GST COMMISSIONERATE DELHI & ORS.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/PMS23052025CW56502024_113524.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

$~3 (SDB) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 23rd May, 2025 W.P.(C) 5650/2024 & REVIEW PET. 166/2025 ADITYA MADAAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar Babbar, Adv. versus COMMISSIONER CGST GST COMMISSIONERATE DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aakarsh Srivastava, SSC with Mr. Anand Pandey, Adv. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. REVIEW PET. 166/2025 in W.P.(C) 5650/2024 2. The present review petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner- Aditya Madaan seeking review of the judgment dated 7th February, 2025 (hereinafter, the ‘judgment’) passed in a batch of matters titled M/s Addichem Speciallity LLP v. Special Commissioner I, Department of Trade and Taxes Anr. (2025:DHC;737-DB). 3. Vide the said judgment, the Court inter alia decided the issue, whether delay can be condoned in an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act. On this issue, it was held that the delay is not condonable. The relevant portion of the judgment is extracted hereunder: “69. In summary, the power to condone delay caused in 70. In view of the forgoing discussion, as it

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/may/aditya-madaan-vs-commissioner-cgst-gst-commissionerate-delhi-ors