# WP/4605/2019 of Saleem Mohd Vs THE STATE OF AP

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-03-25
Citation: APHC010102782019
Petitioner: WP/4605/2019 of Saleem Mohd
Respondent: THE STATE OF AP

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010102782019_1_2025-03-26.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 4605 OF 2019 Between: SALEEM MOHD ...PETITIONER AND STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: M.DURGA PRASAD RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): SHAIK KHAJA BASHA FOR WAKF BOARD The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondent No.2 in issuing the impugned Office Order F.No.E2/65/2007-S, dated 24.09.2018 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, void, and unconstitutional and in violation of principles of natural justice and to pass such other order or orders in the circumstances of the case .” 2. Heard Sri M.Durga Prasada Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Sri Shaik Khaja Basha, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.2. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Petitioner was initially appointed as Additional Inspector Auditor in L.D.Cadre in A.P.State Wakf Board on 25.05.1987 and lat

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/wp-4605-2019-of-saleem-mohd-vs-the-state-of-ap