# WP/3995/2017 of BANDREDDY RAJA GOPAL REDDY Vs HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE,REGISTRAR(VIGILANCE),HYD,& 2

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-03-24
Citation: APHC010565932017
Petitioner: WP/3995/2017 of BANDREDDY RAJA GOPAL REDDY
Respondent: HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE,REGISTRAR(VIGILANCE),HYD,& 2

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010565932017_1_2025-03-25.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

1 APHC010565932017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3525] (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3995/2017 Between: Bandreddy Raja Gopal Reddy ...PETITIONER AND High Court Of Judicature Registrarvigilance Hyd 2 and ...RESPONDENT(S) Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V R REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P S P SURESH KUMAR 2. GP FOR LAW & LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: (per Hon’ble DR. Justice K. Manmadha Rao) This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India for the following relief: “…..to call for the entire records in Inquiry No 2 of 2014 on the file of District Judge Kadapa- cum-Disciplinary Authority and to grant a Writ or order more fully in the nature of the Writ of Certiorari declaring the acts of the 2nd Respondents in issuing proceeding dated 30062015 in Enquiry No 2 of 2014 as illegal unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14, 15, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and violative of Principles of Natural 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/wp-3995-2017-of-bandreddy-raja-gopal-reddy-vs-high-court-of-judicature-registrar-vigilance-hyd-2