# WP/29510/2018 of Dr.K.Mahadevamma Vs Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams,

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-03-24
Citation: APHC010617922018
Petitioner: WP/29510/2018 of Dr.K.Mahadevamma
Respondent: Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams,

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010617922018_1_2025-03-25.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

APHC010617922018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3396] (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 29510/2018 Between: Dr.K.Mahadevamma ...PETITIONER AND Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MADHAVA RAO NALLURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. C SINDHU KUMARI 2. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “.... to issue a writ order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 1 and 2 in issuing Proceedings ROC No.TTD-80021(31)/31/2018-DEO-SEC-TTD, dated 31.05.2018 ignoring the seniority of the petitioner and the Proceedings Roc.No.EDN1/9817/DEO/2011 dated 20.07.2018 as illegal, arbitrary, malafide and violative of Arts. 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequentially, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/wp-29510-2018-of-dr-k-mahadevamma-vs-tirumala-tirupati-devasthanams