# WP/16097/2016 of Smt.K.Chandrakala, W/o K.Srinivasulu Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-03-23
Citation: APHC010819872016
Petitioner: WP/16097/2016 of Smt.K.Chandrakala, W/o K.Srinivasulu Reddy
Respondent: The State of Andhra Pradesh

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010819872016_1_2025-03-24.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

APHC010819872016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3460] (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 16097/2016 Between: Smt. K.Chandrakala, W/o K.Srinivasulu Reddy ...PETITIONER(S) and Others AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G RAMA SARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No. 16097 of 2016 ORDER: 1. The Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondent No.2 in issuing Tender E-Procurement No.1/2016-17, dt. 27.04.2016 by fixing the Tender Date as 17.05.2016 in respect of the demolished portion i.e., the first floor of the Old Syndiate bank Shopping Complex, Puttaparthi Circle, Proddatur Town, without reference to Shop Nos. 2,4, 5, 6 and 7, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. This Court had noted the submission of the then Standing Counsel that the possession of the Petitioners would not be interfered with pursuant to the impugned Notice and the tender for co

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/wp-16097-2016-of-smt-k-chandrakala-w-o-k-srinivasulu-reddy-vs-the-state-of-andhra-pradesh