# V RAVI PRAKASH PRESIDENT RTV vs MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MMRDA

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2025-03-18
Citation: PIL/37/2025
Petitioner: V RAVI PRAKASH PRESIDENT RTV
Respondent: MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MMRDA

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6IkVZSGdCSHFzM21BazdLbGhtck5qSFE9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoibitoMDhHY2ZMT3gxaDZvNzM2N21lamZTS3dEQWhDYUw0ZnVpUVFNOFYySzV1alRDKy9YOXZwSjZpT3FDellES1JOOTRQVTRzcWRXcXh1NDVRWHVGcFE9PSIsIm1hYyI6IjZiMDhiZjg5Y2VmZjBlMjdlYjEzMzgzMjlmMjZjMzUwODE5ZjNhMGNiM2JhY2ZlZDBiMDQyNzFjNzUwZmQxNjMiLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782776745&signature=d15259669ee32bd72091dc462599707b46394c16de16ed425c4e9bc4dd67aa66)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

32968.24-pil IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO.32968 OF 2024 BASAVRAJ V. Ravi Prakash, GURAPPA President, RTV ….. Petitioner PATIL 1. Dr. Birendra Saraf, Advocate General with Smt. Pooja Patil, AGP for respondent No.2 – State Mr.Mukul Rohatgi, Senior Advocate (through VC) a/w. Basavraj Page|1 32968.24-pil Mr. Darius Khambata, Senior Advocate, Mr. Vivek Reddy, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Shrinivas Bobde, Mr. Rohan Dakshini, Mr. Vishesh Malviya, Ms. Nikita Mishra, Ms. Janaki Garde, Mr. Tejas Popat, Ms. Rakshita Singh, Mr, Raghav Dharmadhikari, Mr. Himanshu Saraswat, Mr. K.Pratik Reddy i/b. Rashmikant & Partners for respondent No.3 and for applicant in IAL/5415/2025. Mr. Amit Ambu Satyarthi and Mr. Varun Chugh i/b. Alph Legal Consultants for respondent No.3 Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar a/w. Mr. Pravin H. Padave, Mr. Bijish Balan i/b. ASR and Associates for respondent No.4 Mr. Ram Apte, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Sagar Patil, Ms. Suruchi Rokade i/b. Mr. Mayuresh Legal for respondent No.8 CORAM: ALOK ARADHE, CJ. & BHARATI DANGRE, J. RESERVED ON : MARCH 5, 2025 PRONOUNCED ON : MARCH 18, 2025 JUDGMENT (PER : CHIEF JUSTICE

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/v-ravi-prakash-president-rtv-vs-mumbai-metropolitan-region-development-authority-mmrda