# TILAK RAJ CHITKARA vs MANISHA JAIN

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-03-25
Citation: CM(M)-950/2022 2025:DHC:2006
Petitioner: TILAK RAJ CHITKARA
Respondent: MANISHA JAIN

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60925032025CMM9502022_175123.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 25th March, 2025 CM(M) 950/2022 & CM APPL. 21207/2023 & CM APPL. 65276/2023 & CM APPL. 24369/2024 TILAK RAJ CHITKARA .....Petitioner Through: Present in person. versus MANISHA JAIN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nipun Katyal with Mr. Nishchay Johri and Mr. Surya Pratap Singh Rana, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. The challenge in the present petition is with respect to order dated 25.05.2022, whereby the learned Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal, while refusing to condone the delay. 2. Learned counsel for respondent submits that though the order in question does not call for any interference as the petitioner herein had miserably failed to show any sufficient cause, in order to put quietus to the matter, he would have no objection if, without prejudice to his rights and contentions and subject to imposition of heavy cost, the delay is condoned and a direction is also given to the learned Appellate Court to dispose of such appeal, as expeditiously as possible. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent also submits that he has already received the possession of the tenanted premises in

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/tilak-raj-chitkara-vs-manisha-jain