# SURESH DATTATREY NAIK AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ORS

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2025-03-24
Citation: WP/1498/2016
Petitioner: SURESH DATTATREY NAIK AND ORS
Respondent: THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ORS

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6ImtjekhjbnhhbnZja09QanRIeDRqeFE9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiM2poLzhGbWNXZFU4UTNQdGc5dmowanNOREZodjJLdkJwdzlmd3MzYWFkSk9UV0JEQWRCU2V4TGx1OGxYR1QreCt3ZW8vYjZRZXhSQmtIZjcremxTZXc9PSIsIm1hYyI6IjcxYmZiYzQzYTE1ZGU5YzVhMDUwYzRhMjRiZDI0ZWZkMTY2ZDg1YzhmNWI1MTc2NmZhYjcwNjcwMjNiNjE2Y2MiLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782776709&signature=4c43f2ad9f4882cfbbf51a38955d0538d2896c7e13733398072a8c5259033abc)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

WP-1498-2016+ (J-F).docx Amol IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1488 OF 2016 1. Avinash Dhavji Naik, ] Age:- 54 years, ] 2. Arun Dhavji Naik ] Age:- 45 years, ] Residing at Village Bamandongri ] Post Vahal, Taluka Panvel, ] District Raigad 410206 ]…Petitioners VERSUS AMOL PREMNATH JADHAV 1. The State of Maharashtra ] 2. The Deputy Collector ] (Land Acquisition), ] Metro Centre No.1, New Panvel, ] Taluka Panvel, District Raigad. ] 3. The Deputy Collector ] (Land Acquisition), ] Metro Centre No.3, New Panvel, ] Taluka Panvel, District Raigad. ] 4. City and Industrial Development ] Corporation of Maharashtra Limited, ] CIDCO Bhavan, CBD- Belapur, ] Navi Mumbai. ] No.4 added as party Respondent in ] WP-1498-2016+ (J-F).docx pursuance of Order dated 23/03/2017 ] passed by this Hon’ble Court in the ] present matter in CAW No. 1359/16 ]…Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1498 OF 2016 1. Suresh Dattatrey Naik, ] Age:- 54 years, ] 2. Janardan Dattatrey Naik ] Age:- 65 years, ] 3. Murlidhar Datttarey Naik ] Age:- 62 years, ] 4. Girjabai Dattatrey Naik ] Age:- 80 years, ] 5. Dhanaji Dattatrey Naik ] Age:- 60 years, ] 6. Ashok Dattatrey Na

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/suresh-dattatrey-naik-and-ors-vs-the-state-of-maharashtra-through-the-secretary-and-ors