# SUBHASH CHANDER KAUSHIK & ANR vs KISHNI DEVI @ KRISHNA DEVI

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-03-18
Citation: RSA-228/2019 2025:DHC:2244
Petitioner: SUBHASH CHANDER KAUSHIK & ANR
Respondent: KISHNI DEVI @ KRISHNA DEVI

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/DIS18032025RSA2282019_150216.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA 228/2019 & CM APPL. 49651/2019 SUBHASH CHANDER KAUSHIK & ANR .....Appellants Through: Ms. Somya Goel, Mr. Rohit Yadav, Advs. versus KISHNI DEVI @ KRISHNA DEVI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Kohli, Mr. Mohd. Shariq, Advs. Date of Decision: 18.03.2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA JUDGMENT DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J. (Oral) 1. This present appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the impugned judgment dated 17.08.2019, passed by District and Sessions Judge, South-West, New Delhi, in R.C.A. No. 15/2019 (RCA Civil DJ ADJ/48/2019), titled Subhash Chander Kaushik & Ors. vs. Kishni Devi @ Krishna Devi, whereby the learned appellate court upheld the judgment dated 13.03.2019, passed by the learned ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. RSA 228/2019 2. The brief facts, as stated in the appellate court order dated 17.08.2019, are that the respondent instituted a suit asserting her title over property No. RZ-H-57, Main Mehrauli Road, Gali No.-10, Raj Nagar Part-II, Islam Colony, New Delhi, claiming to have purchased it through a General Power of Attorney, Agreement to Sell, Will,

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/subhash-chander-kaushik-anr-vs-kishni-devi-krishna-devi-delhi-2