# SHASMITH TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED vs MAX HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE LIMITED

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-03-28
Citation: FAO (COMM)-111/2024 2025:DHC:2180-DB
Petitioner: SHASMITH TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED
Respondent: MAX HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE LIMITED

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/CHS28032025FAOC1112024_190015.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO (COMM) 111/2024, CM APPL. 18301/2025 & CM APPL. 18302/2025 SHASMITH TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Mr. Talha Abdul Rahman and Mr. M.Shaz Khan, Advs. versus MAX HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raunaq Kamath and Mr. Siddharth Varshney, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER (ORAL) % 28.03.2025 C.HARI SHANKAR, J. CM APPL. 18301/2025 1. This application seeks stay of proceedings pending before the learned District Judge (Commercial Court)1 in CS (Comm) 555/2022. 2. The present appeal is directed against an order passed by the learned Commercial Court in an application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 “learned Commercial Court” hereinafter 19082. It appears that the respondent has, during the pendency of this appeal, moved an application before the learned Commercial Court under Order XIII-A of the CPC as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2018, seeking summary judgment. 3. It is trite that opinions expressed in interlocutory applications are not binding when the suit is taken up, or even when the application under Order XIII-A is taken up. 4. As such

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/shasmith-technologies-private-limited-vs-max-healthcare-institute-limited-delhi-2