# SH. DEVI DAYAL vs SMT. KALAWATI & ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-03-27
Citation: CM(M)-919/2022 2025:DHC:2091
Petitioner: SH. DEVI DAYAL
Respondent: SMT. KALAWATI & ORS.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60927032025CMM9192022_123126.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 27th March, 2025 CM(M) 919/2022 & CM APPL. 39318/2022 SH. DEVI DAYAL .....Petitioner Through: None. versus SMT. KALAWATI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nitin Arora. Adv for R-1 &2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner takes exception to order dated 06.04.2022 passed by learned Trial Court whereby his application moved under Order I Rule 10 CPC has been dismissed. 2. Applicant claims himself to be a subsequent and bona fide purchaser whereas according to plaintiff, there is no requirement of impleading him as a party as he does not seek any relief against him. 3. However, after hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for plaintiffs (respondent No.1 and 2 herein) submits that, without prejudice to their rights and contentions, and in order to ensure that the suit reaches its logical end without any further delay, they would have no objection if the present petition is allowed and the petitioner herein is permitted to be 4. Taking stock of the pleadings and reason given by the petitioner and also keeping in mind the abovesaid concession given by the plaintiffs, who are dominus 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/sh-devi-dayal-vs-smt-kalawati-ors