# SA/1052/2000 of P.SATYANARAYANA CHERUKUPALLI GUNTUR Vs P.L.POORNACHANDRA RAO NADIMPALLY GUNTUR

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-03-31
Citation: APHC010317612000
Petitioner: SA/1052/2000 of P.SATYANARAYANA CHERUKUPALLI GUNTUR
Respondent: P.L.POORNACHANDRA RAO NADIMPALLY GUNTUR

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010317612000_1_2025-04-01.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

APHC010317612000 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3368] (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 1052/2000 Between: 1. P.SATYANARAYANA CHERUKUPALLI GUNTUR, - ...APPELLANT AND 1. P L POORNACHANDRA RAO NADIMPALLY GUNTUR, - ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1. Y. SRINIVASA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. . The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.1052 OF 2000 J U D G M E N T: Sri B.Sitaram, learned counsel representing Sri Y.Sinivasa Murthy, learned counsel for the appellant appeared through video conference. 2. It appears that the sole respondent in this case died long ago. Even as per the representations made for the appellant, yet no steps are be taken to implead the legal representatives of the deceased-respondent within the time stipulated as per law. Therefore, by operation of law itself, the appeal stands abated. 3. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is disposed of as abated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall s

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/sa-1052-2000-of-p-satyanarayana-cherukupalli-guntur-vs-p-l-poornachandra-rao-nadimpally-guntur